John Haynes / May 13th, 2009 / Photo Journal
PHOTO JOURNAL: John Haynes #12

Haynes sent in a new batch of photos, among which there were two angles of the same trick from Brett Dasovic. Not sure if we’d have a chance to print either of the shots, we set John out to write about them. As it turns out, there was more to the story than we anticipated, including some “photo assistance” from Jeph Howard. Find yourself thinking about what photos can look like from different angles? This PHOTO JOURNAL’s for you. — ONE

I shoot a lot in studios which I both love and hate. I love the control, the ability to move everything exactly where I want it, to have the light from the exact angle I want and with the exact quality I want. What I don’t like is shutting the blinds on a sunny afternoon to fire up tungsten lights. I have always balanced my controlled studio experiences with the crazy skate experiences. Getting kicked out by cops as you’re shooting under a bridge with a train going over you? Just another day in the life of a skate photographer.

The crazy times of being in crazy or difficult locations are balanced perfectly in my life with studio days and good tunes cranked. This shot of Brett Dasovic is one of those days that I truly wished I could have been somehow shooting this in studio. We went to a small town on the Minnesota/Wisconsin border because my friend Ben Fredrikson had seen this spot. The spot is really cool but space under the bridge is limited by a rocky river bank and the bridge itself. Brett wanted to do Royale to Royale to drop, which is a really hard trick when you factor in the drop, but in my life I have shot around 500 royales and get a little tired of doing it the same way over and over. I wanted to communicate the drop, and shooting from the bottom was out of the question because I felt it would just be too boring. Besides, the river bank offered nowhere to stand.

I put on my fisheye and walked around the obstacle (as I often do) shooting test shots. I felt confident about shooting from the top but was hesitant about not being able to see all of his face. He tried the royale a few times and my fears were founded as (like any sane person) he was spotting his landing and not looking at me. He fell on impact a few times and I began to wonder if he would even land the trick (he did land one but the landing was not laced). Jeph Howard sensed my frustration and asked about an angle from higher on the river bank. I told him if he could make it work I would let him shoot it. Jeph likes pushing the button on my camera a lot so he was thrilled, and when I went to go see what he was so excited about I went back on my word and decided to tweak his angle and composition. I felt the long shot was way better, and Brett wanted a better clip, so he did it again and thus you have double angles. — John Haynes

Photos © 2009 John Haynes

Discussion / PHOTO JOURNAL: John Haynes #12

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • ryan schude - May 13th, 2009

    yeah, tough call. i do prefer the fisheye angle aesthetically but it squashes the drop. a filmer down there might have shown a nice sense of scale. either way, well done as always…

  • Eric Palmer - May 14th, 2009

    Good to hear I’m not the only one that walks around looking through my fisheye 😉

    I prefer the long shot, lighting is better & shows everything you need, face, drop, space for him to move into & great texture on the stone walls. Is also cool that he has nearly the exact same body position in both shots.

    Nice article & props to Jeph for spotting that angle.

  • jason reyna - May 14th, 2009

    as a filmer this comes into play a lot. i tend to like long shots more, and in this case i believe i feel the same way. good job on both parties for this one.

  • nick korompilas - May 14th, 2009

    fisheye shot is SO ill…

  • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2024 Molotov Media, LLC,
    Subscribe | Retail Locations | Advertising | Distribution | Contact Us